Special Content

‘Grow up… We debank Democrats, we debank Republicans:’ JPMorgan CEO

‘Grow up... We debank Democrats, we debank Republicans:’ JPMorgan CEO

It was only last month when Jack Mallers, CEO of Bitcoin payments company Strike, accused JPMorgan of closing his personal accounts without explanation.

COINTELEGRAPH IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has denied debanking customers based on their religious or political affiliation and stated that he has actually been working to change the rules surrounding debanking for over a decade. 

During an interview with Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” on Sunday, Dimon said his bank has cut off services to people from all walks of life, but political affiliations have never been a factor.

Devin Nunes, the chair of the president’s intelligence advisory board and CEO of Trump Media, alleges the company was debanked by JPMorgan and that it was among more than 400 Trump‑linked individuals and organizations that had banking records subpoenaed by special counsel Jack Smith as part of an investigation.

Jack Mallers, the CEO of the Bitcoin Lightning Network payments company Strike, also accused JPMorgan of closing his personal accounts without explanation last month, which sparked concerns about another Operation Chokepoint 2.0.

Houston Morgan, the head of marketing at non-custodial crypto trading platform ShapeShift, shared a similar story in November. 

JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon maintains his institution doesn’t debank people for political affiliations. Source: YouTube 

“People have to grow up here, OK, and stop making up things and stuff like that,” Dimon said. “I can’t talk about an individual account. We do not debank people for religious or political affiliations.

“We do debank them. They have religious or political affiliations. We debank people who are Democrats. We debank people who are Republicans. We have debanked different religious folks. Never was that for that reason.”

Dimon said he wants debanking rules to change

Crypto firms have been facing account closures and denials of banking services for years, and many in the industry have stated that these actions are part of a policy-driven effort to suppress the digital assets sector.

However, Dimon said he doesn’t like debanking and wants the rules around reporting requirements that can lead to debanking to change.

“I actually applaud the Trump administration, who’s trying to say that debanking is bad and we should change the rules. Well, damn it, I have been asking to change the rules now for 15 years. So change the rules.”

“It is really customer unfriendly, and we’re debanking people because of suspected things, or negative media, or all these various things,” Dimon added.

In August, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing banking regulators to investigate claims of debanking made by the crypto sector and conservatives.

JPMorgan made recommendations to curb debanking: Dimon 

Dimon said one of the rules banks are required to follow is sharing information with the government when subpoenaed, but he also claims JPMorgan has provided recommendations to reduce reporting and instances of debanking.

Related: Republicans urge action on market structure bill over debanking claims

“We don’t give information to the government just because they ask. We’re subpoenaed. We are required by court to give it to the government. And I have been following subpoenas with this administration, the last administration, the administration before that and the one before that. And I don’t agree with a lot of it,” Dimon said.

“The government does a lot of things that can anger banks. So, let’s just take a deep breath and fix the problems, as opposed to, like, blame someone who’s put in that position,” he added.

At the same time, Dimon said both sides of politics are equal offenders when it comes to leaning on banks.

“Democratic and Republican governments have come after us both; let’s not act like this is just one side doing this. This has been going on for a long time. And we should stop militarizing the government that kind of way.”

Magazine: When privacy and AML laws conflict: Crypto projects’ impossible choice

Related posts

Exit mobile version