A federal judge said there was probable cause to believe that SBF engaged in activities that could land him in jail until his trial in October. 4407 Total views 20 Total shares Listen to article 0:00 News Own this piece of history
Collect this article as an NFT Sam Bankman-Fried could conceivably have his bail revoked after a federal judge said there was probable cause to believe the former FTX CEO may have engaged in attempted witness tampering.
During a Feb. 16 hearing on Bankman-Frieds bail conditions, Judge Lewis Kaplan said there was probable cause to believe that he [Bankman-Fried] has committed or attempted to commit a federal felony while on release, namely witness tampering, according to multiple reports.
Kaplan suggested that this could conceivably see the FTX founder sent back to jail until his trial in October.
Kaplan noted however that the Feb. 16 hearing was not a bail revocation hearing, but added that it could get there, conceivably.
“Why am I being asked to turn him loose in this garden of electronic devices? Kaplan reportedlysaid.
Law professor Richard Painter echoed the sentiment in a Feb. 17 tweet, suggesting that witness tampering might not be a good idea given his current circumstances:Hey Crypto Bro: Witness tampering while out on bail is a great way to go right back to jail.
On Feb. 15, prosecutors asked Judge Kaplan to further restrict Bankman-Frieds device usage to a single monitored computer and cellphone.
Prosecutors pointed to Bankman-Frieds recent device usage as cause for concern, seeking to further restrict and monitor his usage with limited exceptions.
During the hearing, Judge Kaplan suggested that it was naive to believe that these restrictions would stop him from using the internet, given that Bankman-Fried is living with his two parents, who both have laptops and cellphones.
Prosecutor Nicholas Roos seemingly agreed, suggesting there may not be a great solution, which prompted Kaplan to imply that revoking Bankman-Frieds bail could eliminate these risks, noting:There is a solution, but its not one anybody has proposed yet.
Bankman-Frieds lawyers, however, argued that they need him to be able to work on his defense, claiming: We cannot go through these extensive financial records without him.
Related: Judge allows release of identities of guarantors behind Sam Bankman-Frieds bail
The former FTX CEO has been prohibited from using certain messaging appssince Feb. 9, after he was found to have contacted potential witnesses. He was also temporarily banned from using a VPN after prosecutors accused him of using it on two occasions, on Jan. 29 and Feb. 12.
The VPN ban was not extended at the Feb. 16 hearing.
Many both in and out of the crypto community have expressed disbelief that Bankman-Fried is yet to have his bail revoked under the circumstances.
Yes, why? What exactly does @SBF_FTX have on the prosecution that theyre not demanding his bail be immediately revoked? Or do they think he can take down @binance if he flips? Is he waving that at them? Because none of this makes sense otherwise. https://t.co/l66Qls0d46 Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) February 16, 2023 #Fraud #Messaging App #Court #VPN #Sam Bankman-Fried #FTX #Regulation
Add reaction
Add reaction Related News How do you assess the value of an NFT? The SEC shook Kraken down for $30M, but it doesn’t mean they had a case SBFs lawyers move to block release of bail guarantors identities Sam Bankman-Frieds use of a VPN on Super Bowl Sunday raised concerns, say prosecutors Sequoia Capital, Paradigm among VCs facing tricky FTX investor lawsuit
