Crypto firms tout ‘fictitious’ regulatory stamps, Canadian regulator warns

“Fake” regulatory and dispute resolution entities are being used to make some crypto providers look legitimate, warns the Canadian Securities Administrators.

Join us on social networks

Canadian citizens are being advised to double-check crypto trading service providers, as the platforms may be using “fictitious” regulatory bodies to boost their credibility.

According to a June 20 Investor Alert from the Canadian Securities Administrators, some “purported” crypto platforms are claiming to be approved by certain regulatory authorities or dispute resolution organizations in “an effort to appear legitimate.”

“The websites appear to be credible at first glance, with references to complaint processing, dispute resolution and providing redress to aggrieved investors,” the CSA said in a statement.

Investor Alert: Some crypto websites use fake regulatory and dispute resolution organizations to appear legitimatehttps://t.co/Ptqx3RHjfg pic.twitter.com/2QIpwnJdcB

— CSA_News (@CSA_News) June 20, 2023

One such website even said its “fictitious certification makes it ‘a reliable and trustable online trading platform,’” according to the CSA, adding:

“But upon closer inspection, the websites’ language can be awkward and unpolished, with errors in spelling, grammar or syntax — a common ‘red flag’ of illegitimate entities.”

Some “fictitious” regulatory bodies and organizations, as listed by the CSA, include the Financial Standard Commission FSC Canada, Financial Commission/Finacom PLC Ltd., and its associated entity, Blockchain Association.

The CSA claims none of the listed entities are “known,” while also suggesting any entity claiming to be a member of the organizations is “likely fraudulent.”

Cointelegraph found a list of crypto firms that are touted as members of the “Blockchain Association” on its website — the entity is one of the dispute resolution organizations the CSA accused of being illegitimate.

Cointelegraph contacted Etheralabs, Gallant Exchange, SmartDec, StormGain, YouHodler and Finacom PLC Ltd., Cointelligence and Asia Blockchain for comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication.

“Anyone considering using a crypto firm that claims to be certified or a member of a dispute resolution organization should try to independently verify that the referenced organization actually exists,” said the CSA in a statement.

The regulator also advised that citizens considering investing in crypto should check the firms against those registered with the CSA. There are currently 12 crypto trading platforms authorized to do business in Canada, while there are 11 that have filed pre-registration undertakings.

Though the regulator’s statement does not address this, it should be noted that the crypto firms themselves may be victims of the “fake” certifications, and the listing of certification does not necessarily mean a platform is “fraudulent.”

The full list of regulatory bodies and entities that have been accused of being “fake” by the CSA include: